The Future Accounting Department
I have a client with $25 million in sales and $5 million in EBITDA. For a manufacturer, those numbers tend to attract attention from potential buyers. And this year, that’s exactly what happened — we found ourselves in the middle of a due diligence process for a potential transaction. The process went smoothly throughout. In fact, our investment banker remarked that in 25 years, he had never seen a group so responsive to information requests. There was, however, one thing the potential buyer couldn’t get past: for a company this size, how were they operating with no full-time accounting staff? It baffled them throughout the entire process. They were accustomed to an organization this size having a controller, a bookkeeper, and likely additional support staff — an accounting and finance function that typically carries a price tag of $300,000 or more. So how was this company running its entire accounting department for less than $100,000 — and arguably getting the same or better results? The Accounting Department Setup When I first started with this company several years ago, it looked like a typical organization of its size. Revenues were just above $8 million, and they had a controller in place earning $130,000 a year. The owner wasn’t satisfied — not with the quality of the accounting, and not with the insights he was getting into his own results. That’s what brought me in as an outsourced CFO. His instincts were right. The controller wasn’t cutting it, and getting to accurate numbers was going to require a change. Over the next five months, we cycled through two additional controllers — each one more expensive than the last. Around that same time, I had started exploring the idea of hiring a bookkeeping resource in the Philippines for my own practice. I’d spoken with colleagues who had gone that route, and most had very positive things to say. I won’t pretend the cost difference wasn’t a factor — hiring a comparable resource in the Philippines typically runs about 75% less than hiring one in the United States. I brought the idea to the owner, and to his credit, he jumped on it immediately. Within a week, we had interviews scheduled with three firms in the Philippines to help us find the right person. That was three years ago. Today, we have two Philippines-based resources embedded in the accounting function. One operates in an Accounting Manager capacity; the other handles AR and AP. Both have been exceptional, and the quality of their work has been nothing short of outstanding. Preparing for Outsourced Employees I’ve spoken with business owners who have gone down a similar path and not had the same results. When I dig into why, the answer is almost always the same — they approached hiring an outsourced resource the same way they would any other employee. That’s where it breaks down. The key to making an overseas accounting resource work is having strictly documented processes before they start. When we began, we outlined seven or eight core processes — how we invoice customers, how we receive and apply payments, how we follow up on outstanding balances, how to input vendor invoices, and a handful of others. Each process had both a written SOP and a walkthrough video. The onboarding went better than I expected. Our first Philippines resource picked things up quickly, and as she got comfortable with the initial processes, we layered in more. She eventually got so good at her role that we had her lead the hiring process for the AP/AR clerk position. The Accounting Department of the Future The Impact of AI The full impact of AI on accounting and finance is still playing out. We are still a few years away from seeing the complete impact. What isn’t in question is that the impact will be significant. Larger companies — those over $50 million in revenue — have the resources to dedicate teams to automation and AI strategy. The smaller companies I work with have to take a different approach. AI Limitations Before we talk about how AI will be used, let’s acknowledge the current limitations. Almost all of my clients use QuickBooks Online — only two don’t. To say QBO’s use of AI is lacking would be too kind to Intuit. There are two fundamental problems with relying on QBO to lead small businesses into an AI-driven accounting function: So the question becomes: how is QBO going to build meaningful AI solutions for businesses this diverse? They’ll try. But it will fall short. You might be thinking — what about those AI tools that let you upload invoices directly into QBO? Fair point. But those solutions have been around for nearly 20 years. Innovative accounting departments are already using them. Using AI to automate transaction coding – machine learning has been doing that for years. That’s not the future; that’s the present. How AI Will Be Used With things like Claude Cowork and Claude Code now becoming easier to use then ever, small businesses will be able to build custom solutions to fit their specific needs. Today, it’s estimated that fewer than 5% of the general population has used AI to write code. When you take into account that 96.2% of developers admitted to using it to code, it means there is only a small share of the general population that uses AI to code. That’s about to change — and financial professionals are going to be at the center of it. Custom solutions built by people with financial expertise are the future of AI in accounting. Yes, AI can help interpret financial data. But you need to know the right questions to ask, and you need to understand the context behind the answers. That financial judgment doesn’t go away — it becomes more valuable. What changes is that financial expertise will need to be paired with a new skill: the ability to build small, custom applications designed around how a specific business actually works.






